Investigating student satisfaction levels of ADI-SMCS' physical classroom learning space / by John Benedict P. Gamba, Leanne Keisha H. Posadas, Steve Marlon T. Desano, Hans Theodore P. Pedrina, & Cedric G. Panaligan, III.
Contributor(s): Gamba, John Benedict P | Posadas, Leanne Keisha H | Desano, Steve Marlon T | Pedrina, Hans Theodore P | Panaligan, Cedric G., III.
Publisher: [Iloilo City] : [Ateneo de Iloilo], c2025Description: 44 p.Subject(s): High school students | Classrooms--Design and construction--Environment--Student satisfaction | School facilities--ManagementDDC classification: Ref 373.07 In897s 2025 Summary: This study, Investigating Students' Satisfaction Levels of ADI-SMCS' Physical Classroom Learning Space, examined Junior High school students' satisfaction with the physical aspects of their learning space at ADI-SMCS. Using the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Theory, the study evaluated key factors influencing the students' satisfaction of their learning spaces such as classroom furniture, facilities, lighting, and space. A descriptive -survey research design was used, and data was collected from 270 randomly selected Junior High School students in Grades 8, 9, and 10. Statistical analysis, which included mean and standard deviation, t-test, and One-Way ANOVA, determined overall satisfaction levels and variations based on sex and grade level. Findings suggested that lighting and visual comfort, (M=3.49) had the greatest impact on their satisfaction, followed by instructional equipment and visibility (M=3.16) and air circulation and temperature (M=3.15). Classroom aesthetics, spacial comfort, layout flexibility, and furniture functionality also contributed although to a much lesser extent. Overall, students reporteda satisfaction level of M= 3.11 which, according to the researchers' scale of means, was categorized as “Satisfied". No significant difference was found between male and female students (p=0.676), which suggested that sex does not play a major role in satisfaction levels. Similarly, One-Way ANOVA results (F=2.049, p=0.131) showed no significant difference among grade levels. Based on these findings, the researchers would recommend optimizing classroom lighting, improving air circulation, upgrading instructional equipment, and spacial comfort to enhance and maximize student engagement and learning efficiency. Future studies should explore additional factors such as noise levels, technological integration, and comparative analysis on different school settings to provide a more comprehensive understanding of student satisfaction levels of physical classroom learning space.| Item type | Current location | Home library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
.png "Book"){kind=icon}
Book
|
High School Library | High School Library | Filipiniana | Ref 373.07 In897s 2025 (Browse shelf) | 1 | Available | HSD-163 |
Browsing High School Library Shelves , Shelving location: Reference , Collection code: Filipiniana Close shelf browser
| Title | Author | Pages |
|---|
This study, Investigating Students' Satisfaction Levels of ADI-SMCS' Physical Classroom Learning Space, examined Junior High school students' satisfaction with the physical aspects
of their learning space at ADI-SMCS. Using the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Theory, the study evaluated key factors influencing the students' satisfaction of their learning spaces such as classroom furniture, facilities, lighting, and space. A descriptive -survey research design was used, and data was collected from 270 randomly selected Junior High School students in Grades 8, 9, and 10. Statistical analysis, which included mean and standard deviation, t-test, and One-Way ANOVA, determined overall satisfaction levels and variations based on sex and grade level. Findings suggested that lighting and visual comfort, (M=3.49) had the greatest
impact on their satisfaction, followed by instructional equipment and visibility (M=3.16) and air circulation and temperature (M=3.15). Classroom aesthetics, spacial comfort, layout flexibility, and furniture functionality also contributed although to a much lesser extent. Overall, students reporteda satisfaction level of M= 3.11 which, according to the researchers' scale of means, was categorized as “Satisfied". No significant difference was found between male and female students (p=0.676), which suggested that sex does not play a major role in satisfaction levels. Similarly, One-Way ANOVA results (F=2.049, p=0.131) showed no significant difference among grade levels. Based on these findings, the researchers would recommend optimizing classroom lighting, improving air circulation, upgrading instructional equipment, and spacial comfort to enhance and maximize student engagement and learning efficiency. Future studies should explore additional factors such as noise levels, technological integration, and comparative analysis on different school settings to provide a more comprehensive understanding of student satisfaction levels of physical classroom learning space.
300-399