Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The viability of polypropylene (PPF) eco bags as weather resistant additive for cylinder concrete / by Arianna Lorene M. Tallo, Keira Ann T. Quiblatin, Stephanie S. Alonzaga, Azaleah Jaira S. Cajandig, Jeb Sebastien I. Tubilla, & Uriel Emmanuel M. Lao.

Contributor(s): Tallo, Arianna Lorene M | Quiblatin, Keira Ann T | Alonzaga, Stephanie S | Cajandig, Azaleah Jaira S | Tubilla, Jeb Sebastien I | Lao, Uriel Emmanuel M.
Publisher: [Iloilo City] : [Ateneo de Iloilo], c2025Description: 34 p.Subject(s): Polypropylene fibers--Testing | Plastic scrap | Cylinders--ConcreteDDC classification: Ref 373.07 V65 2025 Summary: This study examines the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) additives on concrete cylinder blocks, specifically compressive strength, water absorption, and specific gravity. Concrete samples with o%, 5%, and 15% PPF were tested, and results analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant difference among the groups. However, increasing PPF content led to higher water absorption, reduced weight, and a slight decrease in compressive strength. None of the samples met the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) standard of 3000 psi for compressive strength, and all exceeded the 3% water absorption limit for durability. While PPF-modified concrete offers benefits like lower density and plastic waste repurposing, its mechanical properties may limit its use in load-bearing structures.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Book Book High School Library
High School Library
Filipiniana Ref 373.07 V65 2025 (Browse shelf) 1 Available HSD-141
Total holds: 0

Title Author Pages

This study examines the effects of polypropylene fiber (PPF) additives on concrete cylinder blocks, specifically compressive strength, water absorption, and specific gravity. Concrete samples with o%, 5%, and 15% PPF were tested, and results analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant difference among the groups. However,
increasing PPF content led to higher water absorption, reduced weight, and a slight decrease in compressive strength. None of the samples met the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) standard of 3000 psi for compressive strength, and all exceeded the 3% water absorption limit for durability. While PPF-modified concrete offers benefits like lower density and plastic waste repurposing, its mechanical properties may limit its use in load-bearing structures.

300-399